Friday, August 17, 2012

Addendum to Bullying - do we really want it to stop?

ADDENDUM

Creating a monopoly is another form of bullying.  One of the most threatening organized monopolizing efforts on a global scale is being conducted by a company named Monsanto.  They  brought  us the defoliant Agent Orange which is associated with cancer.  Since that innovation they have developed  genetically engineered seeds for corn, soybeans, etc. designed to be resistant to specific forms of pesticides sold by Monsanto.  Most of the Genetically modified seeds for crops worldwide are sold by Monsanto along with the accompanying designer pesticides.

Marie Monique Robin's book The World  According to Monsanto, exposes this company's efforts to control the world's foood supply.  There is a documentary film by the same name that can be viewed at (www.topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-world-according-to-monsanto/).

Monday, August 6, 2012

Bullying-Pt.6- WHAT TO DO-Do We Really Want It To Stop?

WHAT TO DO

Bullying is not a problem limited to primary and secondary schools and college fraternal organizations.  It has existed throughout history in a variety of forms and persists in numerous venues in this society, including sports at all levels, the financial sector, government, criminals, care giving, home life, and religion.  Bullying in a number of those venues is carried out and approved by apparently responsible rational members of society.  Children are not stupid but if they are confused, is it any wonder?  Adults tell them they should not bully others, but they see instances where adult bullying seems to benefit and win approval for the bullies.  The problem of bullying in schools will not be resolved until there is a successful effort to eradicate it from American society and culture generally.  Perhaps we need a Bullies Anonymous organization modeled on AA.  That would be helpful to bullies who wish to change their attitudes and behavior, such as myself.  I consider myself a bully in recovery.

Just as there are alcoholics who don't care to change, there are bullies who prefer the way things are. One of my favorite quotes is applicable here.

"With the reasonable I will reason.  With the humane I will plead.  But with tyrants I will yield no ground, waste no argument."                                                                    William Loyd Garrison

Replace "tyrants" with "bullies" and we have a method for dealing with active adult bullies set in their ways, whether its the premier of China or the child molester next door.  If your children see that their parents are boycotting products made in China because the Chinese government is bullying Tibet, they are less likely to bully their siblings and peers.  Bullies need support.  Support reinforces the bullying.  If you want to be part of the solution, stop supporting active bulllies. 

Don't buy any product and/or service from which active bullies directly profit.  Don't vote for them.  Don't browse their websites.  Don't purchase their literature.  Don't attend their churches nor speeches.  Don't contribute to their causes.

Contribute to legitimate organizations which are working to stop specific forms of bullying such as SPLC (www.splcenter.org), AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL (www.amnesty.usa.org).  We can talk to children endlessly about the evils of bullying and urge them to stand up to bullies.  Another method of learning that lesson occurs when children see that their parents , teachers and other responsible adults are serious  about stopping bullying in our society and in our world. 




Friday, August 3, 2012

Bullying-Pts 4 & 5-World Politics and Religious - Do We Really Want it to Stop? Pts 4&5

Before I start Part 4 I need to comment on the Chick-Fil-A controversy.  There are those in favor of boycotting this business run by a person who has spoken out against equal rights for homosexuals.  He even called homosexuals "arrogant".  That's like the pot calling the kettle black coming from a person who self-righteously speaks as if he is the Voice of God.  Critics of the boycott are trying to spin this controversy as a free speech issue.  That is so senseless.  I have not heard anyone say the head of Chick-Fil-A should not have the right to express his disapproval of homosexuality.  Personally, I'm glad he did.  I like knowing I'm not buying chicken from at least one company whose CEO has a bullying attitude toward homosexuals.  I heard someone quoted as saying I should not take "political action" against  someone whose opinion differs from  my own.  Isn't that what the political process is all about in this country?  As far as I know the head of Chick-Fil-A is not running for any political office anyway.  So what's political about people expressing disapproval of his bullying attitude toward homosexuals?  I have as much right to express my opinion as any CEO does. I should have the right not to work for a bully, not to hire bullies, not to let my money add to  bullies' profits. If you want to know why you should boycott Chick-Fil-A, read the entire "Bullying-Do We Really Want it to Stop?" blog.  If you would prefer your offspring to be bullies, don't bother.
R. Geiger

PART 4
BULLYING AND WORLD POLITICS

The United States armed forces acting as the official bullying power of their country invaded Iraq, changing the political leadership of that country.  Then members of that same bullying force got caught humiliating enemy POWs at Abu-Ghraib.  Why is it that the bullying of POWs was made to seem more offensive than bullying all of Iraq?  Perhaps it depends on how one spins the story.  The invasion of Iraq was supposedly prompted by some one's information that the dictator Sadam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction in his arsenal and by his refusal to destroy said weapons.  We  realize in hindsight that there were no weapons for him to destroy.  Even if there had been, would that have justified an invasion?  Imagine invading every country run by a despot who might possess weapons of mass destruction.  Would that be justified or just senseless and offensive?
Consider the following scenario:
America elects a president who is quite popular but develops clear and obvious signs of mental instability.  The Congress refuses to depose him/her from power.  There is no question that this president has power over enough weapons of mass destruction to wipe out the civilized world.  The United Nations tries negotiating.  When that fails sanctions are imposed against the U.S.  The popular president refuses to give up the office nor the weapons.  Russia and/or China grow impatient demanding immediate disarmament and destruction of all nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons in the American arsenal.  They feel the only acceptable alternative is to destroy the weapons themselves.  If the invasion of Iraq was justified, how much more just would the invasion of America in this scenario be?

Until the United Nations outlaws all weapons of mass destruction everywhere on and above this earth, every country should have the right to possess such weapons as long as the weapons are not used against a non-aggressive country and as long as they do not have destructive effects on the rest of the world.  If the world community were to agree that all weapons of mass destruction should be forever banned, then any country, group, or individual would have no right to possess such weapons.  In that case the confiscation of such weapons by legitimate international law enforcement would not be bullying.  In a world without weapons of mass destruction, no country would need such weapons.

Another form of bullying related to the world stage is genocide, the organized attempt to destroy a whole nation or ethnic group.  Sometimes genocide is physical as the Nazis trying to eradicate all European Jews.  Genocide can also be aimed at a culture as the U.S. government's attempt to integrate native Americans into white society and culture and the present Chinese attempt to destroy the culture of the Tibetan people.  Whenever organized attempts at physical or cultural genocide exist, there is a bully behind it and bullies doing the killing, raping, property destruction, etc.

In a separate section of this blog, I mentioned that I would like the power to bully all active bullies into stopping.  It occurred to me how similar that seems to this month's (Nov. 2012) Middle East conflict between Israel and Hammas of the West Bank.  Israel has more power.  Hammas would like to wipe Israel off the map.  Hammas perceives Israel as the Big Bully and the fact that they dare to taunt the Big Bully with mortars and missiles, indicates their desire to overcome or out bully the bully.
PART 5
RELIGIOUS BULLYING
 There is probably no religion in this world that has not experienced bullying in the form of discrimination and/or persecution.  It is difficult to understand why religious denominations, once they reach a stage where they possess any power and influence in a society, sometimes take their turn frightening and tyrannizing non-believers.  The early Christians were persecuted by the Romans.  The Christian church survived and eventually ended up dominating the Holy Roman Empire.  Christians are remembered for killing witches and torturing native Americans in the process of "converting" them.  In the United States the doctrine of separation of church and state was instituted to protect religious freedom of all citizens and to prevent the government from being taken over by any specific group that would use their power to force their religious beliefs and practices on all Americans.  There are people of the religious Christian right who would force all Americans to live according to their beliefs and values through legislation if they had that power.  I believe they are actively trying to attain that power.  There is little difference in mindset between the "Christian" religious fanatics in this country and those in the Middle East who believe whole countries should be run according to Islamic law and customs.  They are bullies with similar agendas.  Just as infidels top the black list of  fanatic Islamists, atheists and certain types of unrepentant sinners top the black list of fanatic Christians.  The goal of each fanatical group is to control people's behavior. This is bullying.

The "Christians" who bomb abortion clinics and attempt to kill doctors who perform abortions are the same type of bullies as the "Islamists" who planned and carried out the destruction of the Twin Towers on 9/11.  Christians is in parentheses because the word literally means a follower of Christ.  Remember him?  Stripped, beaten, whipped, nailed to a cross?  DEFINITELY NOT A BULLY!  In fact, perhaps the most famous victim of bullying in human history.  How is it that people who purport to believe in him, can have such bullying attitudes?   
   

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Bullying- Historically Speaking - Do we Really Want it to Stop? Pt. 3

 A "disclaimer":  I'm not a professional social psychologist nor an historian.  I possess a little knowledge about a wide range of subjects.  So without further ado, I will start writing about  bullying from an historical viewpoint.

HISTORICALLY SPEAKING
I suppose the first bully was Cain who slew Abel.  That was just the beginning.  History is full of famous, or rather infamous, bullies. Caesar, Genghis Khan, Francisco Pizarro, Cortez, George III of England, Geronimo, Napoleon, Mussolini, Adolf Hitler, Tito, Hiro Hito, Joseph Stalin, Joseph McCarthy, J. Edgar Hoover, George Wallace, Pol Pot, Sadam Hussein and Bin Laden are just a few of many well-known bullies throughout the breadth of human history.  These bullies did not bully in isolation.  They were men of power because they had the support of large numbers of people or at least the support of others in power.

A number of these bullies led their countries to invade non-aggressive countries to occupy and/or to depose the legitimate leadership of the non-aggressive countries.  Such invasions are examples of organized bullying on a grand scale.  In the first half of the twentieth century, Germany tried twice to bully the rest of Europe; Japan invaded China and Manchuria; Russia  took possession of much of eastern Europe; and China invaded and took possession of Tibet.

Bullying has been and continues to be widespread throughout our world.  It is hard to imagine what life on earth would look like without the influence of the bullies that have shaped and continue to shape human history.  I believe that, without bullying, more human energy would have gone into positive creativity that could have eliminated poverty, diseases, and unnecessary pollution; preserved natural wilderness; and beautified cities.

Children are not taught in school what might have been if it had not been for the infamous bullies and massive organized bullying that they study in history class.  They are aware, on some level, that infamous bullies, while not being well-known scientists, nor great diplomats, nor notable inventors, nevertheless have shaped human history to varying degrees and have made their names memorable in the process. 

Some American students may even be smart enough to realize that if it weren't for bullying in this country's past, their families would not  be enjoying their current socio-economic status.  Where would the many families in this country be if their ancestors had not been bullies?  Perhaps Spain or France could have afforded to pay fair market value for the American real estate they claimed as their own.  Instead of paying the Native Americans for what the land was worth, they just took it by force of occupation.  The newly formed government of the United States which had yet to impose an income tax on its citizens could not afford to pay a fair price to the natives whose land was being occupied by its citizens.  Instead of paying the tribes for their land, the U.S. government beat them into submission through violence, starvation, disease, and broken promises.  Having confined the survivors to  reservations, the government attempted cultural genocide by integrating native Americans, particularly children, many of whom were forcibly separated from their parents, into white society.

The nineteenth century doctrine of Manifest Destiny claiming that continued expansion of the Republic was its obvious destiny, was a thinly veiled rationalized justification for bullying the Indian tribes west of the Mississippi River as well as aboriginal peoples of some Pacific and Caribbean Islands. 

Would the greatest nation on Earth still be so great if it weren't for bullying?  How many American fortunes were made through the Slavery, Tobacco, and Firearms trade?  The institution of slavery was a form of bullying from which some of the founding fathers, including Thomas Jefferson, profited financially.  The slave owners of the South were dependent on slaves for their socio-economic status and this was a factor in their decision to secede from the Union rather than give up slavery.

Even after Emancipation former slaves and their descendants were still treated like second-class citizens thanks to Jim Crow laws.  As late as the 1970s "undesirable" poor black men and women in states like California and Arkansas were sterilized without their permission.  This was certainly a form of tyranny.  One could argue that this practice resulted in smaller welfare rolls which benefits all taxpayers.

There are intelligent human beings who believe that bullying is a manifestation of the natural law of survival of the fittest.  Wasn't that Hitler's solution-to create a master race by weeding out the weakest?  One could also argue that children bullying one another is a way of establishing a pecking order, similar to animals in which the strongest gets the most to eat.  As long as adults give any validity to these notions, bullying by children is inevitable.